Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Title: Evaluation of decision-making units based on the weight-optimized DEA model (English)
Author: Sun, Jiasen
Author: Yang, Rui
Author: Ji, Xiang
Author: Wu, Jie
Language: English
Journal: Kybernetika
ISSN: 0023-5954 (print)
ISSN: 1805-949X (online)
Volume: 53
Issue: 2
Year: 2017
Pages: 244-262
Summary lang: English
.
Category: math
.
Summary: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a methodology for measuring best relative efficiencies of a group of peer decision-making units (DMUs) that take multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. However, the traditional DEA model only aims to maximize the efficiency of the DMU under evaluation. This usually leads to very small weights (even zero weights) being assigned to some inputs or outputs. Correspondingly, these inputs or outputs have little or even no contribution to efficiency, which is unfair and irrational. The purpose of this paper is to address this problem. Two new weight-optimized models are proposed based upon the perspective of cross evaluation. Using the results of an Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) example, it is found that all AMTs are fully sorted. The decision maker can easily choose the best AMT. In addition, unreasonable weights of AMTs are effectively avoided. (English)
Keyword: data envelopment analysis (DEA)
Keyword: efficiency
Keyword: weight-optimized model
Keyword: cross evaluation
MSC: 90B50
idZBL: Zbl 06770167
idMR: MR3661351
DOI: 10.14736/kyb-2017-2-0244
.
Date available: 2017-06-25T17:57:46Z
Last updated: 2018-01-10
Stable URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz/146804
.
Reference: [1] Anderson, T. R., Hollingsworth, K., Inman, L.: The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model..J. Productivity Anal. 17 (2002), 3, 249-255. 10.1023/a:1015012121760
Reference: [2] Andersen, P., Petersen, N. C.: A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis..Management Sci. 39 (1993), 10, 1261-1264. Zbl 0800.90096, 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
Reference: [3] Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis..Management Sci. 30 (1984), 9, 1078-1092. Zbl 0552.90055, 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Reference: [4] Bougnol, M. L., Dulá, J. H.: Anchor points in DEA..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 192 (2009), 2, 668-676. Zbl 1157.90435, MR 2454796, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.034
Reference: [5] Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., Thanassoulis, E.: Applied data envelopment analysis..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 52 (1991), 1, 1-15. 10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-o
Reference: [6] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978), 6, 429-444. Zbl 0425.90086, MR 0525905, 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Reference: [7] Chen, C. M., Delmas, M. A., Lieberman, M. B.: Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research..Strategic Management J. 36 (2015), 1, 19-36. 10.1002/smj.2199
Reference: [8] Cook, W. D., Bala, K.: Performance measurement and classification data in DEA: input-oriented model..Omega 35 (2007), 1, 39-52. 10.1016/j.omega.2005.02.002
Reference: [9] Cook, W. D., Seiford, L. M.: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 192 (2009), 1, 1-17. Zbl 1180.90151, MR 2458453, 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032
Reference: [10] Cook, W. D., Tone, K., Zhu, J.: Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model..Omega 44 (2014), 1-4. 10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004
Reference: [11] Cook, W. D., Zhu, J.: DEA Cobb-Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency..J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65 (2013), 2, 265-268. 10.1057/jors.2013.13
Reference: [12] Cook, W. D., Zhu, J.: DEA Cross Efficiency. In Data Envelopment Analysis..Springer US 2015. MR 3362964, 10.1007/978-1-4899-7553-9_2
Reference: [13] Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K.: Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software..Springer-Verlag US, 2007. Zbl 1111.90001, 10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8
Reference: [14] Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Zhu, J.: Data envelopment analysis. In Handbook on data envelopment analysis..Springer US 2004. MR 2077628, 10.1007/1-4020-7798-x_1
Reference: [15] Cui, Q., Li, Y.: Evaluating energy efficiency for airlines: An application of VFB-DEA..J. Air Transport Management 44 (2015), 34-41. 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.02.008
Reference: [16] Despotis, D. K.: Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units..J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53 (2002), 3, 314-323. Zbl 1103.90350, 10.1057/palgrave/jors/2601253
Reference: [17] Doyle, J. R., Green, R. H.: Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses..J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45 (1994), 5, 567-578. Zbl 0807.90016, 10.1038/sj/jors/0450509
Reference: [18] Doyle, J. R., Green, R. H.: Cross-evaluation in DEA: improving discrimination among DMUs..Infor 33 (1995), 3, 205-222. Zbl 0832.90002, 10.1080/03155986.1995.11732281
Reference: [19] Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., Tavares, G.: Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA..Socio-economic Planning Sci. 42 (2008), 3, 151-157. MR 2593179, 10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002
Reference: [20] Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., Costantino, N., Pietroforte, R.: Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 218 (2012), 2, 523-529. Zbl 1244.90156, MR 2874471, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.031
Reference: [21] Green, R. H., Doyle, J. R., Cook, W. D.: Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 90 (1996), 3, 461-472. Zbl 0911.90009, 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00039-9
Reference: [22] Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Jafari, Y., Maddahi, R.: Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation..Appl. Math. Modelling 35 (2011), 1, 544-549. Zbl 1202.90249, MR 2677963, 10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.020
Reference: [23] Ji, X., Sun, J., Wang, Y., Yuan, Q.: Allocation of emission permits in large data sets: a robust multi-criteria approach..J. Cleaner Product. 142 (2017), 894-906. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.117
Reference: [24] Ji, X., Wu, J., Zhu, Q.: Eco-design of transportation in sustainable supply chain management: A DEA-like method..Transport. Res. Part D: Transport and Environment 48 (2016), 451-459. 10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.007
Reference: [25] Khouja, M.: The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection..Computers Industr. Engrg. 28 (1995), 1, 123-132. 10.1016/0360-8352(94)00032-i
Reference: [26] Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., Zhu, J.: Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation..Int. J. Product. Econom. 113 (2008), 2, 1025-1030. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.12.006
Reference: [27] Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., Zhu, J.: The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium..Oper. Res. 56 (2008), 5, 1278-1288. Zbl 1167.91330, MR 2468913, 10.1287/opre.1070.0487
Reference: [28] Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W. D., Zhu, J.: DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation..Ann. Oper. Res. 145 (2006), 1, 35-49. Zbl 1106.90045, MR 2258637, 10.1007/s10479-006-0026-7
Reference: [29] Lim, S.: Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA..Computers Industr. Engrg. 62 (2002), 3, 726-731. 10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.010
Reference: [30] Lim, S., Zhu, J.: DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale..J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66 (2014), 3, 476-487. MR 3362965, 10.1057/jors.2014.13
Reference: [31] Lim, S., Zhu, J.: DEA Cross Efficiency Under Variable Returns to Scale. In Data Envelopment Analysis..Springer US 2015. MR 3362965
Reference: [32] Maddahi, R., Jahanshahloo, G.J. ZhuR., Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh, Ebrahimnejad, A.: Optimising proportional weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation..Int. J. Oper. Res. 19 (2014), 2, 234-245. MR 3242695, 10.1504/ijor.2014.058953
Reference: [33] Ramón, N., Ruiz, J.J. ZhuL., Sirvent, I.: A multiplier bound approach to assess relative efficiency in DEA without slacks..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 203 (2010), 1, 261-269. Zbl 1176.90313, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.07.009
Reference: [34] Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., Sirvent, I.: On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 207 (2010), 3, 1564-1572. 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.022
Reference: [35] Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., Sirvent, I.: Reducing differences between profiles of weights: A "peer-restricted" cross-efficiency evaluation..Omega 39 (2011), 6, 634-641. 10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.004
Reference: [36] Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., Hogan, A. J.: Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions..New Directions for Program Evaluation 1986 (1986), 32, 73-105. 10.1002/ev.1441
Reference: [37] Sun, J., Miao, Y., Wu, J., Cui, L., Zhong, R.: Improved interval DEA models with common weight..Kybernetika 50 (2014), 5, 774-785. Zbl 1308.90078, MR 3301860, 10.14736/kyb-2014-5-0774
Reference: [38] Sun, J., Wu, J., Guo, D.: Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights..Appl. Math. Modelling 37 (2013), 9, 6301-6310. MR 3039010, 10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.010
Reference: [39] Sun, J., Wu, J., Liang, L., Zhong, R. Y., Huang, G. Q.: Allocation of emission permits using DEA: centralised and individual points of view..Int. J. Product. Res. 52 (2014), 2, 419-435. 10.1080/00207543.2013.829592
Reference: [40] Sun, S.: Assessing computer numerical control machines using data envelopment analysis..Int. J. Product. Res. 40 (2002), 9, 2011-2039. Zbl 1048.90509, 10.1080/00207540210123634
Reference: [41] Tone, K.: A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 130 (2001), 3, 498-509. Zbl 0990.90523, MR 1816667, 10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00407-5
Reference: [42] Wang, Y. .M., Chin, K. S.: Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation..Int. J. Product. Econom. 128 (2010), 1, 332-338. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.032
Reference: [43] Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S.: A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension..Expert Systems Appl. 37 (2010), 5, 3666-3675. 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.10.024
Reference: [44] Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Jiang, P.: Weight determination in the cross-efficiency evaluation..Computers Industr. Engrg. 61 (2011), 3, 497-502. 10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.004
Reference: [45] Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Luo, Y.: Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units..Expert Systems Appl. 38 (2011), 8, 10312-10319. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.116
Reference: [46] Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.: DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units..Appl. Math. Comput. 173 (2006), 2, 902-915. Zbl 1112.90355, MR 2207985, 10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.023
Reference: [47] Wu, J., Liang, L., Chen, Y.: DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings..Omega 37 (2009), 4, 909-918. 10.1016/j.omega.2008.07.001
Reference: [48] Wu, J., Liang, L., Yang, F.: Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game..Expert Systems Appl. 36 (2009), 1, 872-876. 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.006
Reference: [49] Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L.: Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model..Computers Industr. Engrg. 63 (2012), 2, 513-519. 10.1016/j.cie.2012.04.017
Reference: [50] Wu, J., Sun, J., Zha, Y., Liang, L.: Ranking approach of cross-efficiency based on improved TOPSIS technique..J. Systems Engrg. Electron. 22 (2011), 4, 604-608. 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2011.04.008
Reference: [51] Zhou, P., Wang, B., Poh, K. L.: A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies..Europ. J. Oper. Res. 189 (2008), 1, 1-18. MR 2397682, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.042
.

Files

Files Size Format View
Kybernetika_53-2017-2_5.pdf 332.3Kb application/pdf View/Open
Back to standard record
Partner of
EuDML logo