Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Full entry | Fulltext not available (moving wall 24 months)      Feedback
Keywords:
left conjugacy closed loop; power associativity; left Cheban loop; autotopism; loop identities
Summary:
An LTWC is a loop that satisfies $x\cdot (x\cdot yx)z=(x\cdot xy)\cdot xz$. LTWC loops are proved to be power associative and left conjugacy closed (LCC). An LCC loop is LTWC if and only if $ x(x\cdot yx)=(x\cdot xy)x$. Connections to left Bol loops, left Cheban loops and loops satisfying $(xy\cdot x)\cdot xz=x\cdot(yx\cdot x)z$ (LWPC) are also considered.
References:
[1] Bruck R. H.: A Survey of Binary Systems. Reihe: Gruppentheorie, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, (N.F.), 20, Springer, Berlin, 1958. Zbl 0141.01401
[2] Burn R. P.: Finite Bol loops. II. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 89 (1981), no. 3, 445–455. DOI 10.1017/S0305004100058357
[3] Csörgö P., Drápal A.: Left conjugacy closed loops of nilpotency class two. Results Math. 47 (2005), no. 3–4, 242–265. DOI 10.1007/BF03323028
[4] Drápal A.: On multiplication groups of left conjugacy closed loops. Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 45 (2004), no. 2, 223–236.
[5] Drápal A.: On left conjugacy closed loops with a nucleus of index two. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 74 (2004), 205–221. DOI 10.1007/BF02941536
[6] Drápal A., Jedlička P.: On loop identities that can be obtained by a nuclear identification. European J. Combin. 31 (2010), no. 7, 1907–1923. DOI 10.1016/j.ejc.2010.01.007
[7] Drápal A., Syrbu P.: Middle Bruck loops and the total multiplication group. Results Math. 77 (2022), no. 4, Paper No. 174, 27 pages. DOI 10.1007/s00025-022-01716-2
[8] George O. O.: On holomorph of WIP PACC loops. Jordan J. Math. Stat. 16 (2023), no. 3, 463–482.
[9] George O. O., Jaiyéọlá T. G.: Nuclear identification of some new loop identities of length five. Buletinul Academiei de Ştiinţe a Rep. Mold. Mat. 2022 99 (2022), no. 2, 39–58.
[10] George O. O., Olaleru J. O., Adéníran J. O., Jaíyéọlá T. G.: On a class of power associative LCC-loops. Extracta Math. 37 (2022), no. 2, 185–194. DOI 10.17398/2605-5686.37.2.185
[11] Jaíyéọlá T. G.: A Study of New Concepts in Smarandache Quasigroups and Loops. InfoLearnQuest (ILQ), Ann Arbor, 2009.
[12] Nagy P. T., Strambach K.: Loops as invariant sections in groups, and their geometry. Canad. J. Math. 46 (1994), no. 5, 1027–1056. DOI 10.4153/CJM-1994-059-8
[13] Nagy G. P., Vojtěchovský P.: The LOOPS Package, Computing with quasigroups and loops in GAP 3.4.4. http://www.gap-system.org/Manuals/pkg/loops/doc/manual.pdf, 2024.
[14] Osoba B., Jaiyéọlá T. G., Abdulkareem A. O.: Variations of some inverse properties in Cheban loops. Quasigroups Related Systems 33 (2025), no. 1, 95–106.
[15] Pflugfelder H. O.: Quasigroups and Loops: Introduction. Sigma Series in Pure Mathematics, 7, Heldermann Verlag, Berlin, 1990.
[16] Phillips J. D.: A short basis for the variety of WIP PACC-loops. Quasigroups Related Systems 14 (2006), no. 1, 73–80.
[17] Phillips J. D., Shcherbacov V. A.: Cheban loops. J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl. 4 (2010), Art. ID G100501, 5 pages.
[18] S\`olárin A. R. T., Adéníran J. O., Jaiyéọlá T. G., Isere A. O., Oyebo Y. T.: Some varieties of loops (Bol–Moufang and Non-Bol–Moufang types). in: Algebra without Borders – Classical and Constructive Nonassociative Algebraic Structures---Foundations and Applications, STEAM-H: Sci. Technol. Eng. Agric. Math. Health, Springer, Cham, 2023, pages 97–164.
Partner of
EuDML logo