Article
Full entry |
PDF
(0.2 MB)
Feedback
PDF
(0.2 MB)
Feedback
Keywords:
decision making; consistency; Saaty’s AHP
decision making; consistency; Saaty’s AHP
Summary:
In the decision making methods based on the pairwise comparison there is very important to enter the preferences of compared elements in the rational way. Only in this case we are able to obtain the reasonable solution. In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) there is set a strict consistency condition in order to keep the rationality of preference intensities between compared elements. But this requirement for the Saaty’s matrix is not achievable in the real situations because of the Saaty’s scale which is used in this method. That is why instead of the consistency condition we suggest a weak consistency condition which is very natural and more suitable for the linguistic descriptions of the Saaty’s scale and as a result of it, it is easier to reach this requirement in the real situations. In addition, if we order compared elements from the most preferred to the least preferred, it is very easy to check if the weak consistency is satisfied. Big advantage of our approach to the consistency is that its satisfaction can be easily approved. It is also possible to control the weak consistency of the Saaty’s matrix during the filling of the intensities of preferences. We also show on the example that there can be situations in which the weak consistency condition is more suitable for checking the rationality of the preferences than the Saaty’s consistency ratio.
References:
[1] Aitchison, J.: The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 44, 2 (1982), 139–177. MR 0676206 | Zbl 0491.62017
[2] Alonso, J. A., Lamata, M. T.: Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 14, 4 (2006), 445–459. DOI 10.1142/S0218488506004114 | Zbl 1097.68633
[3] Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., Rapoport, A.: A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement 10, 1 (1986), 69–78. DOI 10.1177/014662168601000106
[4] Crawford, G., Williams, C.: The Analysis of Subjective Judgment Matrices. The Rand Corporation, California, 1985.
[5] Lamata, M. T., Pelaez, J. I.: A Method for Improving the Consistency Judgements. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10, 6 (2002), 677–686. DOI 10.1142/S0218488502001727 | MR 1963991
[6] Meyer, C. D.: Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra Book and Solutions Manual. SIAM: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2000. MR 1777382
[7] Saaty, T. L.: Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science 32, 7 (1986), 841–855. DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841 | MR 0846562 | Zbl 0596.90003
[8] Saaty, T. L.: Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Services Sciences 1, 1 (2008), 83–98. DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
[9] Saaty, T. L.: Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research 145 (2003), 85–91. DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8 | MR 1947158 | Zbl 1012.90015
[10] Saaty, T. L.: How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990), 9–26. DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I | Zbl 0707.90002
[11] Saaty, T. L.: Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making, Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors – The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. RACSAM 102, 2 (2008), 251–318. MR 2479460 | Zbl 1177.62009
[12] Stoklasa, J., Jandová, V., Talašová, J.: Weak consistency in Saaty’s AHP – evaluating creative work outcomes of Czech Art Colleges. Neural Network 23 (2013), 61–77.
[13] Talašová, J.: Fuzzy metody vícekriteriálního hodnocení a rozhodování. Vydavatelství UP, Olomouc, 2003.
Search
Partner of
