Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Title: Weak Consistency: A New Approach to Consistency in the Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process (English)
Author: Jandová, Věra
Author: Talašová, Jana
Language: English
Journal: Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica
ISSN: 0231-9721
Volume: 52
Issue: 2
Year: 2013
Pages: 71-83
Summary lang: English
.
Category: math
.
Summary: In the decision making methods based on the pairwise comparison there is very important to enter the preferences of compared elements in the rational way. Only in this case we are able to obtain the reasonable solution. In the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) there is set a strict consistency condition in order to keep the rationality of preference intensities between compared elements. But this requirement for the Saaty’s matrix is not achievable in the real situations because of the Saaty’s scale which is used in this method. That is why instead of the consistency condition we suggest a weak consistency condition which is very natural and more suitable for the linguistic descriptions of the Saaty’s scale and as a result of it, it is easier to reach this requirement in the real situations. In addition, if we order compared elements from the most preferred to the least preferred, it is very easy to check if the weak consistency is satisfied. Big advantage of our approach to the consistency is that its satisfaction can be easily approved. It is also possible to control the weak consistency of the Saaty’s matrix during the filling of the intensities of preferences. We also show on the example that there can be situations in which the weak consistency condition is more suitable for checking the rationality of the preferences than the Saaty’s consistency ratio. (English)
Keyword: decision making
Keyword: consistency
Keyword: Saaty’s AHP
MSC: 62C86
idZBL: Zbl 06296016
idMR: MR3202381
.
Date available: 2013-12-18T15:24:06Z
Last updated: 2014-07-30
Stable URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz/143540
.
Reference: [1] Aitchison, J.: The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 44, 2 (1982), 139–177. Zbl 0491.62017, MR 0676206
Reference: [2] Alonso, J. A., Lamata, M. T.: Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 14, 4 (2006), 445–459. Zbl 1097.68633, 10.1142/S0218488506004114
Reference: [3] Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., Rapoport, A.: A comparison of the eigenvalue method and the geometric mean procedure for ratio scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement 10, 1 (1986), 69–78. 10.1177/014662168601000106
Reference: [4] Crawford, G., Williams, C.: The Analysis of Subjective Judgment Matrices. The Rand Corporation, California, 1985.
Reference: [5] Lamata, M. T., Pelaez, J. I.: A Method for Improving the Consistency Judgements. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10, 6 (2002), 677–686. MR 1963991, 10.1142/S0218488502001727
Reference: [6] Meyer, C. D.: Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra Book and Solutions Manual. SIAM: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 2000. MR 1777382
Reference: [7] Saaty, T. L.: Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science 32, 7 (1986), 841–855. Zbl 0596.90003, MR 0846562, 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
Reference: [8] Saaty, T. L.: Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int. J. Services Sciences 1, 1 (2008), 83–98. 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Reference: [9] Saaty, T. L.: Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research 145 (2003), 85–91. Zbl 1012.90015, MR 1947158, 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
Reference: [10] Saaty, T. L.: How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990), 9–26. Zbl 0707.90002, 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Reference: [11] Saaty, T. L.: Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making, Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors – The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. RACSAM 102, 2 (2008), 251–318. Zbl 1177.62009, MR 2479460
Reference: [12] Stoklasa, J., Jandová, V., Talašová, J.: Weak consistency in Saaty’s AHP – evaluating creative work outcomes of Czech Art Colleges. Neural Network 23 (2013), 61–77.
Reference: [13] Talašová, J.: Fuzzy metody vícekriteriálního hodnocení a rozhodování. Vydavatelství UP, Olomouc, 2003.
.

Files

Files Size Format View
ActaOlom_52-2013-2_7.pdf 251.3Kb application/pdf View/Open
Back to standard record
Partner of
EuDML logo