Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Title: A continuum of path-dependent equilibrium solutions induced by sticky expectations (English)
Author: Krejčí, Pavel
Author: Kwame, Eyram
Author: Lamba, Harbir
Author: Rachinskii, Dmitrii
Author: Zagvozdkin, Andrei
Language: English
Journal: Applications of Mathematics
ISSN: 0862-7940 (print)
ISSN: 1572-9109 (online)
Volume: 68
Issue: 6
Year: 2023
Pages: 751-793
Summary lang: English
.
Category: math
.
Summary: We analyze a simple macroeconomic model where rational inflation expectations are replaced by a boundedly rational, and genuinely sticky, response to changes in the actual inflation rate. The stickiness is introduced in a novel way using a mathematical operator that is amenable to rigorous analysis. We prove that, when exogenous noise is absent from the system, the unique equilibrium of the rational expectations model is replaced by an entire line segment of possible equilibria with the one chosen depending, in a deterministic way, upon the previous states of the system. The agents are sufficiently far-removed from the rational expectations paradigm that problems of indeterminacy do not arise.\looseness -1 \endgraf The response to exogenous noise is far more subtle than in a unique equilibrium model. After sufficiently small shocks the system will indeed revert to the same equilibrium but larger ones will move the system to a different one (at the same model parameters). The path to this new equilibrium may be very long with a highly unpredictable endpoint. At certain model parameters exogenously-triggered runaway inflation can occur. \endgraf Finally, we analyze a variant model in which the same form of sticky response is introduced into the interest rate rule instead. (English)
Keyword: macroeconomic model
Keyword: rational expectation
Keyword: hysteresis play operator
Keyword: equilibrium point
Keyword: path-dependence
Keyword: sticky inflation
MSC: 37N40
MSC: 47J40
DOI: 10.21136/AM.2023.0229-22
.
Date available: 2023-11-23T12:14:21Z
Last updated: 2023-11-24
Stable URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz/151939
.
Reference: [1] Anderson, S. P., Palma, A. de, Thisse, J.-F.: Discrete choice theory of product differentiation.J. Econ. Literature 31 (1993), 1972. MR 1201148
Reference: [2] Antinolfi, G., Azariadis, C., Bullard, J. B.: Monetary policy as equilibrium selection.Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 89 (2007), 331-342.
Reference: [3] Arnold, M., Begun, N., Gurevich, P., Kwame, E., Lamba, H., Rachinskii, D.: Dynamics of discrete time systems with a hysteresis stop operator.SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 16 (2017), 91-119. Zbl 1361.37076, MR 3592068, 10.1137/16M1073522
Reference: [4] Benhabib, J., Farmer, R. E. A.: Indeterminacy and sunspots in macroeconomics.Handbook Macroeconomics 1 (1999), 387-448. 10.1016/S1574-0048(99)01009-5
Reference: [5] Bick, A.: Threshold effects of inflation on economic growth in developing countries.Econ. Lett. 108 (2010), 126-129. 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.04.040
Reference: [6] Branch, W. A.: Sticky information and model uncertainty in survey data on inflation expectations.J. Econ. Dyn. Control 31 (2007), 245-276. Zbl 1162.91457, 10.1016/j.jedc.2005.11.002
Reference: [7] Brock, W. A., Hommes, C. H.: A rational route to randomness.Econometrica 65 (1997), 1059-1095. Zbl 0898.90042, MR 1475075, 10.2307/2171879
Reference: [8] Calvo, G. A.: Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework.J. Monetary Econ. 12 (1983), 383-398. 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0
Reference: [9] Carroll, C. D.: Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters.Q. J. Econ. 118 (2003), 269-298. Zbl 1057.91054, 10.1162/00335530360535207
Reference: [10] Colander, D., Howitt, P., Kirman, A., Leijonhufvud, A., Mehrling, P.: Beyond DSGE models: Toward an empirically based macroeconomics.Am. Econ. Rev. 98 (2008), 236-240. 10.1257/aer.98.2.236
Reference: [11] Curtin, R.: Inflation expectations and empirical tests: Theoretical models and empirical tests.Inflation Expectations Routledge International Studies in Money and Banking 56. Taylor & Francis, London (2010), 34-61.
Reference: [12] Grauwe, P. De: Booms and busts in economic activity: A behavioral explanation.J. Econ. Behavior Organization 83 (2012), 484-501. 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.013
Reference: [13] Evans, G. W., McGough, B.: Observability and Equilibrium Selection.University of Oregon, Eugene (2015).
Reference: [14] Frimpong, J. M., Oteng-Abayie, E. F.: When is inflation harmful? Estimating the threshold effect for Ghana.Am. J. Econ. Business Administration 2 (2010), 232-239. 10.3844/ajebasp.2010.232.239
Reference: [15] Göcke, M.: Various concepts of hysteresis applied in economics.J. Econ. Surveys 16 (2002), 167-188. 10.1111/1467-6419.00163
Reference: [16] Göcke, M., Werner, L.: Play hysteresis in supply or in demand as part of a market model.Metroeconomica 66 (2015), 339-374. Zbl 1420.91093, 10.1111/meca.12074
Reference: [17] Ishlinskii, A. Y.: Some applications of statistical methods to describing deformations of bodies.Izv. AN SSSR, Techn. Ser. 9 (1944), 580-590.
Reference: [18] Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk.Econometrica 47 (1979), 263-291. Zbl 0411.90012, MR 3618580, 10.2307/1914185
Reference: [19] Kaldor, N.: The irrelevance of equilibrium economics.Econ. J. 82 (1972), 1237-1255. 10.2307/2231304
Reference: [20] Khan, M. S., Senhadji, A. S.: Threshold effects in the relationship between inflation and growth.IMF Staff Papers 48 (2001), 1-21. 10.2307/4621658
Reference: [21] Krasnosel'skii, M. A., Pokrovskii, A. V.: Systems with Hysteresis.Springer, Berlin (1989). Zbl 0665.47038, MR 0987431, 10.1007/978-3-642-61302-9
Reference: [22] Krejčí, P.: Hysteresis and periodic solutions of semilinear and quasilinear wave equations.Math. Z. 193 (1986), 247-264. Zbl 0658.35065, MR 0856153, 10.1007/BF01174335
Reference: [23] Krejčí, P., Lamba, H., Melnik, S., Rachinskii, D.: Analytical solutions for a class of network dynamics with mechanical and financial applications.Phys. Rev. E 90 (2014), Article ID 032822, 12 pages. 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032822
Reference: [24] Krejčí, P., Lamba, H., Melnik, S., Rachinskii, D.: Kurzweil integral representation of interacting Prandtl-Ishlinskii operators.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. B 20 (2015), 2949-2965. Zbl 1335.47043, MR 3402678, 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.2949
Reference: [25] Krejčí, P., Lamba, H., Monteiro, G. A., Rachinskii, D.: The Kurzweil integral in financial market modeling.Math. Bohem. 141 (2016), 261-286. Zbl 1389.34140, MR 3499787, 10.21136/MB.2016.18
Reference: [26] Kremer, S., Bick, A., Nautz, D.: Inflation and growth: New evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis.Empir. Econ. 44 (2013), 861-878. 10.1007/s00181-012-0553-9
Reference: [27] Lamba, H., Krejčí, P., Rachinskii, D.: The global stability of a class of history-dependent macroeconomic models.Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 15 (2020), Article ID 49, 24 pages. Zbl 1475.37106, MR 4173151, 10.1051/mmnp/2019061
Reference: [28] Mankiw, N. G., Reis, R.: Sticky information versus sticky prices: A proposal to replace the New Keynesian Phillips curve.Q. J. Econ. 117 (2002), 1295-1328. Zbl 1032.91094, 10.1162/003355302320935034
Reference: [29] Mankiw, N. G., Reis, R., Wolfers, J.: Disagreement about inflation expectations.NBER Macroecon. Annual 18 (2003), 209-248. 10.1086/ma.18.3585256
Reference: [30] Muth, J. F.: Rational expectations and the theory of price movements.Econometrica 29 (1961), 315-335. 10.2307/1909635
Reference: [31] Prandtl, L.: Ein Gedankenmodell zur kinetischen Theorie der festen Körper.Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 8 (1928), 85-106 German \99999JFM99999 54.0847.04. 10.1002/zamm.19280080202
Reference: [32] Robinson, J.: History versus equilibrium.Indian Econ. J. 21 (1974), 202.
Reference: [33] Rudd, J., Whelan, K.: Can rational expectations sticky-price models explain inflation dynamics?.Am. Econ. Rev. 96 (2006), 303-320. 10.1257/000282806776157560
Reference: [34] Setterfield, M.: Should economists dispense with the notion of equilibrium?.J. Post Keynesian Econ. 20 (1997), 47-76. 10.1080/01603477.1997.11490138
Reference: [35] Vinayagathasan, T.: Inflation and economic growth: A dynamic panel threshold analysis for Asian economies.J. Asian Econ. 26 (2013), 31-41. 10.1016/j.asieco.2013.04.001
.

Fulltext not available (moving wall 24 months)

Partner of
EuDML logo