| Title:
|
Fibonacci, Mersenne, Mendel (Czech) |
| Author:
|
Eclerová, Veronika |
| Author:
|
Zemánek, Petr |
| Language:
|
Czech |
| Journal:
|
Rozhledy matematicko-fyzikální |
| ISSN:
|
0035-9343 (print) |
| Volume:
|
99 |
| Issue:
|
1 |
| Year:
|
2024 |
| Pages:
|
18-24 |
| Summary lang:
|
Czech |
| . |
| Category:
|
math |
| . |
| Summary:
|
Článek krátce přibližuje Mendelovy základní objevy týkající se jeho experimentů s hrachem a také s experimenty spojenou kontroverzi. (Czech) |
| . |
| Date available:
|
2024-04-09T12:41:54Z |
| Last updated:
|
2024-04-09 |
| Stable URL:
|
http://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz/152333 |
| . |
| Reference:
|
[1] Alzer, H., Luca, F.: An inequality for Fibonacci numbers.Mathematica Bohemica, 147 (2022), 4, 587–590. MR 4512175, 10.21136/MB.2022.0032-21 |
| Reference:
|
[2] Fisher, R. A.: Has Mendel’s work been rediscovered?.Annals of Science, 1 (1936), 2, 115–137. 10.1080/00033793600200111 |
| Reference:
|
[3] Gliboff, S.: Gregor Mendel and the Laws of Evolution.History of Science, 37 (1999), 2, 217–235. 10.1177/007327539903700204 |
| Reference:
|
[4] Hartl, D. L., Fairbanks, D. J.: Mud sticks: on the alleged falsification of Mendel’s data.Genetics, 175 (2007), 975–979. 10.1093/genetics/175.3.975 |
| Reference:
|
[5] Jarošová, M.: Fibonacci a jeho čísla.Učitel matematiky, 16 (2008), 2, 94–100. |
| Reference:
|
[6] Křížek, M., Luca, F., Somer, L.: Aritmetické vlastnosti Fibonacciových čísel.Pokroky matematiky, fyziky a astronomie, 50 (2005), 2, 127–140. |
| Reference:
|
[7] Mendel, J. G.: Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden.Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn, 4 (1866), 3–47. |
| Reference:
|
[8] Novitski, E.: On Fisher's criticism of Mendel's results with the garden pea.Genetics, 166 (2004), 3, 1133–1136. 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1133 |
| Reference:
|
[9] Novitski, E.: Revision of Fisher's analysis of Mendel's garden pea experiments.Genetics, 166 (2004), 3, 1139–1140. 10.1534/genetics.166.3.1139 |
| Reference:
|
[10] Teicher, A.: Mendel's use of mathematical modelling: ratios, predictions and the appeal to tradition.History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 36 (2014), 187–208. 10.1007/s40656-014-0019-9 |
| . |
