Previous |  Up |  Next

Article

Title: Stranger things about forcing without AC (English)
Author: Goldstern, Martin
Author: Klausner, Lukas D.
Language: English
Journal: Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae
ISSN: 0010-2628 (print)
ISSN: 1213-7243 (online)
Volume: 61
Issue: 1
Year: 2020
Pages: 21-26
Summary lang: English
.
Category: math
.
Summary: Typically, set theorists reason about forcing constructions in the context of Zermelo--Fraenkel set theory (ZFC). We show that without the axiom of choice (AC), several simple properties of forcing posets fail to hold, one of which answers Miller's question from the work: Arnold W. Miller, {Long Borel hierarchies}, MLQ Math. Log. Q. {54} (2008), no. 3, 307--322. (English)
Keyword: forcing
Keyword: axiom of choice
Keyword: non-AC forcing
Keyword: ZF
MSC: 03E25
MSC: 03E40
idZBL: Zbl 07217155
idMR: MR4093426
DOI: 10.14712/1213-7243.2020.013
.
Date available: 2020-04-30T11:12:52Z
Last updated: 2022-04-04
Stable URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10338.dmlcz/148072
.
Reference: [1] Karagila A.: Do choice principles in all generic extensions imply AC in $V$?.Answer to a MathOverflow question, 2018.
Reference: [2] Kunen K.: Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs.Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 102, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1983. Zbl 0534.03026, MR 0756630
Reference: [3] Miller A. W.: Long Borel hierarchies.MLQ Math. Log. Q. 54 (2008), no. 3, 307–322. MR 2417803, 10.1002/malq.200710044
.

Files

Files Size Format View
CommentatMathUnivCarolRetro_61-2020-1_3.pdf 266.6Kb application/pdf View/Open
Back to standard record
Partner of
EuDML logo